Duragesic Product Liability - Personal Injury - Lawsuits

Personal Injury Law Firms experienced inin 1989 and again in 1990 that ALZA had not
negligence, malpractice and other types ofresponded to his request for more information on
personal injury actions have taken note of recentthe effects of external heat.  After Duragesic hit
product liability actions involving the drug,the market in April of 1991, ALZA and Janssen
Duragesic.learned of six reports from healthcare providers
Duragesic® is the trade name for athat external heat appeared to increase blood
pain-medication patch containing fentanyl, a potentfentanyl levels in patients in the hospital setting
opioid analgesic.  Duragesic is a transdermaland at home.
system-the medicine, fentanyl, is absorbedHowever, the first time Janssen or ALZA made
through the patient's skin and into thean effort to warn of the effects of external heat
bloodstream, providing pain relief for up to threecame in a January 17, 1994 "Dear Doctor" letter
days (72 hours) from a single patch application.with an attached proposed labeling revision.  The
Duragesic is prescribed in five dosage strengths: labeling contained a new heat warning, which was
12, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mcg of fentanyl per hour.buried at page 10 of the attachment, but no
The 50, 75, and 100 ug/h doses are onlymention was made in the letter itself to alert
prescribed for patients who are already on andphysicians that external heat applied to the patch
tolerant to opioid therapy, and require continuouswas potentially life-threatening.
opioid administration.  Moreover, the DuragesicGOVERNMENT REGULATION
label warns that 12 mcg/hour as an initiating doseIn 2004, the FDA influenced Janssen and ALZA to
has not been systematically evaluated; therefore,issue two Class I Recalls of Duragesic, "due to
Duragesic should be used only in patients who areimproper sealing of one of their edges," which
opioid-tolerant.could result in a life-threatening overdose of
Fentanyl was found to be a good choice forfentanyl.  Yet, this was not the first time the
transdermal application because of itsFDA encountered problems with the companies'
physicochemical properties and high analgesichandling of Duragesic.  In fact, prior to the recalls
potency.  However, Fentanyl is not without itsin 2004, the FDA has required Duragesic labeling
serious adverse effects.  Pharmacologically,revisions 13 times.
fentanyl acts on the central nervous systemAnd, as recently as July 2005, the FDA issued a
causing analgesia, sedation, severe respiratoryPublic Health Advisory concerning the use of
depression, muscle rigidity, seizures, coma, andDuragesic Patches in response to reports of
hypotension.  Adverse reactions include mooddeaths in patients using the patch.
changes, euphoria, dysphoria, drowsiness,Beginning in 1994, the FDA sent ALZA a "warning
constricted pupils, nausea, and vomiting.  Theletter" identifying certain violations and deviations
most serious side effect of fentanyl overdose isfrom Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)
hypoventilation (respiratory depression), which canregulations under the Food and Drug Act. This
be fatal.prompted the company to issue a letter to all
Development of Duragesichealth care professionals warning of Duragesic
Currently, only eleven transdermally administeredmisuse.
drugs are on the market; seven of which wereIn the late 1990s, the Department of Health and
developed by ALZA.  In 1981, ALZA respondedHuman Services warned Janssen that its
to a plea from a White House-created committeepromotional materials to expand the use of
of scientists and physicians to develop moreDuragesic were in direct violation of the Federal
potent analgesics with alternative deliveryFood, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and contained
systems for critically ill and dying patients whomisrepresentations as to the safety and efficacy
were suffering from intractable pain. ALZA beganof the product. The agency determined that the
work on a project to develop a fentanylpromotional pieces were "false or misleading
transdermal patch in late 1982.because they contain misrepresentations of
In early 1983, ALZA representatives met withsafety information, broaden Duragesic's indication,
agents from the DEA to discuss the handling ofcontain unsubstantiated claims, and lack fair
fentanyl.  Among other issues, the DEAbalance."
expressed concern that the dosage be kept to anFollowing Janssen's "voluntary" recall of Duragesic
absolute minimum, because of the potential forin 2004, the FDA issued a "Safety Alert" warning
overdose and abuse.that the recall was "due to a potential leak in the
In 1991, ten years after ALZA proposed theproduct seal," which could result in skin exposure
development of a transdermal fentanyl patch,to fentanyl.  The warning adds that "skin
Duragesic was made available for sale in theexposure to any leaked medication from a
United States.  Originally, Duragesic was approvedDURAGESIC patch may cause nausea, sedation,
to treat acute, postoperative anddrowsiness, or potentially life-threatening
moderate-to-severe pain.  However, due to thecomplications."  Govt Regulation 6.  Janssen also
slow onset of drug levels from the transdermalwrote a letter to "Healthcare Professional[s]"
delivery and three day maintenance of drug levelsinforming them of the expanded recall in April
with Duragesic, the system was more suited for2004.
treatment of chronic pain conditions, in particular,Furthermore, on September 2, 2004 the FDA
cancer patients.  By 1998, the World Healthissued Janssen another "warning letter." This letter
Organization (WHO) recommended transdermalstates that the latest Duragesic promotional
fentanyl for treatment of cancer pain in stablepieces make "false or misleading claims about the
patients.abuse potential and other risks of the drug,
Since receiving FDA approval in 1990, ALZA andincluding unsubstantiated effectiveness claims for
Janssen aggressively sought the expansion ofDuragesic."  The letter states, "By suggesting
Duragesic use beyond cancer patients.  Forthat Duragesic has a lower potential for abuse
example, transdermal fentanyl has been used tocompared to other opioid products, the file card
treat rheumatologic pain and severe back pain.could encourage the unsafe use of the drug,
The FDA has also approved an expansion ofpotentially resulting in serious or life-threatening
Duragesic to treat pediatric patients.hypoventilation."
Janssen's most recent advertising campaign toThe Duragesic product label was again updated in
expand the use of Duragesic was thwarted byJune 2005 to add new safety information in
the FDA.  In the late 1990s, the company sent aseveral areas of labeling, and Janssen issued
document called Top Ten List to doctors urginganother "Dear Healthcare Professional" letter
physicians to switch their patients to Duragesicabout these changes. Under a section entitled
patches rather than use more traditional type pain"Hypoventilation (Respiratory Depression)," the
relievers.  Among the reasons listed is the phraseletter warns that "Serious or life-threatening
"It's not just for end stage cancer any more!" hypoventilation may occur at any time during the
However, in 2000, the Department of Health anduse of DURAGESIC® especially during the initial
Human Services wrote a letter to Janssen24-72 hours following initiation of therapy and
informing the company that its promotional piecesfollowing increases in dose."  Janssen also warns
concerning the "Broadening of indication" forof a "potential for temperature-dependant
Duragesic were misleading and containedincreases in fentanyl released from the system
misrepresentations.  The government agencyresulting in possible overdose and death." 
responded, "The suggestion that Duragesic can beTherefore, the letter instructs all patients to avoid
used for any type of pain management promotesexposing Duragesic to "direct external heat
Duragesic for a much broader use that issources, such as heating pads or electric blankets,
recommended by the PI, and thus, is misleading."heat lamps, saunas, hot tubs, and heated water
Currently, Duragesic is the most widely prescribedbeds, etc., while wearing the system."
transdermal medication.  From 2002 to 2003, theFinally, on July 15, 2005 the FDA issued a "Public
total number of fentanyl patch prescriptions withinHealth Advisory" concerning the use of Duragesic
the United States rose from 4.5 million to 5.4Patches in response to reports of deaths in
million-a twenty percent increase.  And thepatients using the patch. The FDA stated it is
resulting sales figures for Duragesic have beenconducting an investigation into the deaths related
enormous:  total annual sales in the United Statesto fentanyl overdose in patients using Duragesic. 
have reached one and a half billionAccording to the FDA, "Some patients and health
($1,500,000,000.00) dollars annually.care providers may not be fully aware of the
And in 2005, Duragesic sales generated two pointdangers of this very strong narcotic painkiller. 
one billion ($2,100,000,000.00) dollars worldwide.Therefore, FDA is issuing this public health
Duragesic Defects:advisory to alert patients and their caregivers and
Package Leak-Subsequent Recallshealth care professionals by highlighting the
The design/manufacturing defect most applicablefollowing important safety information."
to our case is an improper sealing of one edge ofMEDICAL LITERATURE
the Duragesic patch, resulting in millions of patchesFentanyl Overdose
being recalled.  During 2004, ALZA (throughSince Duragesic hit the marketplace in 1991,
Janssen) initiated two large Class I recalls ofstudies have shown continued high numbers of
Duragesic for this exact reason.  The first wasoverdoses involving transdermal delivery of
February 17, 2004 at which time Duragesicfentanyl.  The most serious side effect is
Control No. 0327192 (75 mcg/hr) was pulled fromrespiratory depression, which can be fatal.  One
the market.  The cited reason was a potentialstudy, published in 1991, examined 112
seal breach on one edge of the patch, which couldfentanyl-related deaths in the Eastern United
result in fentanyl leaking from the patch.  ThisStates, mostly in California.  Fentanyl deaths
recall included about 440,000 patches.appeared to occur rapidly, "probably the result of
On April 5, 2004, Janssen expanded its recall ofacute respiratory depression."  While
Duragesic to include 2.2 million patches (Controlacknowledging the extreme potency of fentanyl,
Numbers 0327192, 0327193, 0327294, 0327295,the author suggests that "the incidence of
and 0330362).  Again, the reason cited was thefentanyl-related deaths is probably determined by
potential for a breach of the seal, which wouldthe general availability of the drug, rather than the
result in fentanyl leakage.  Janssen sent a "Dearrelative potency of the analogs."
Healthcare Professional" letter to inform of theIn a study published in 2000, the Los Angeles
expanded recall.County Department of the Coroner analyzed 25
A leak of fentanyl from a Duragesic patch couldcases involving fentanyl-related deaths.    The
cause patients to receive either too much or tooauthor notes that the Los Angeles County
little of the drug.   If the fentanyl seeps out ofCoroner's Office evaluates nearly one case each
the patch before its application to the skin,month involving fentanyl patch-related death. 
patients may receive too little medication toAnother study that same year identified 61 cases
adequately treat their pain. In this situation,of transdermal drug overdoses in a Regional
patients used to a specific does may experiencePoison Information System over a five-year
withdrawal effects including sweating,period.
sleeplessness, and abdominal discomfort.Head-Induced Overdose
Conversely, fentanyl leaks that occur while theHeat is expected to increase skin permeability,
patch is on the skin expose patients to ametabolism and elimination of fentanyl.  If drug
potentially life-threatening overdose of fentanyl. release from the system is much faster than
Duragesic is designed to deliver only a controlledpermeation through the skin, the skin controls the
amount of fentanyl into the patient's skin. transdermal absorption rate into the patient's
Patients wearing a defective patch that leakssystemic circulation, rather than Duragesic's special
fentanyl directly onto the skin will receive toorate control membrane.
much of the medication.  If this occurs, patientsSeveral case reports have described the
could experience minor complications such asdevelopment of life-threatening overdose caused
sedation, drowsiness, and nausea.  Fentanylby a heating pad or rise in body temperature. 
overdose may result in more seriousFrolich et al. reported a narcotic overdose in a
complications, including fatal hypoventilationpatient that was using a warming blanket to
(respiratory depression) or cardiac arrest.relieve pain following surgery.  Medical Literature
When Jansen placed Duragesic on the market in17, see M.A. Frolich et al., Opioid Overdose in a
1991, reports of toxicity due to fentanylPatient Using a Fentanyl Patch During Treatment
overdosing were fairly common.  In fact, onewith a Warming Blanket, 93 ANESTH. ANALG.
study in California of 112 deaths associated with647-48 (2001) (unable to obtain hard copy).  The
fentanyl concluded that the general availability ofincrease in absorption may account for other
the drug may be responsible for the high incidenceheat-related toxicity associated with transdermal
of overdoses.fentanyl.  G. Newshan, Heat-Related Toxicity with
Furthermore, in a recent Duragesic lawsuit filedthe Fentanyl Transdermal Patch, 16 J. PAIN
against Johnson & Johnson, Janssen, andSYMPTOM MGMT. 277-78 (1998) (unable to obtain
ALZA, the plaintiffs alleged that "despite knowinghard copy).
of this defect, the defendants (Johnson &One study, in 2003, examined the effect of heat
Johnson, Janssen, ALZA) took inadequate stepson transdermal fentanyl absorption. The authors
to advise physicians, hospitals, nursing homes andconcluded that increases in skin temperature may
other health care professionals of the defect andresult in increased systemic absorption of
the significant damages to users of the Duragesicfentanyl.  Therefore, warming blankets and
patches."heating pads should not be either used in
Heat-Induced Overdoseconjunction with, or placed over Duragesic
ALZA and Janssen's knowledge of the overdosingpatches.
potential caused by external heat dates back toHowever, as of 2003, the Duragesic label warned
1986, when ALZA did lab testing on athat serum fentanyl concentrations may
nitroglycerin-delivering patch using the same"theoretically" increase by one third in patients
co-polymer membrane used in Duragesicwith a body temperature of 40 degrees Celsius
patches.   ALZA subsequently did lab testing onbecause of accelerated drug release and
Duragesic in 1988-that showed that a five degreeincreased skin permeability.  The current label
Centigrade increase in temperature doubledwarns of a "potential for temperature-dependent
Duragesic's release rate.  Dr. Curtis Wright, theincreases in fentanyl release from the system.
FDA Medical Review Officer, was quite concerned