| rganizational Culture | | | | Obsessive-Compulsive Company Culture |
| | | | Another pre-employment test client of mine also |
| Pre-employment tests clearly tell you if a job | | | | had me test its best employees in many jobs, so |
| applicant could fit in’ your | | | | it could hire applicants with the highest probability |
| company’s culture. But, you must carry | | | | of (a) fitting in’ its culture and (b) being |
| out an important step. This article reveals what | | | | highly productive workers. |
| to do. | | | | Again, pre-employment test benchmark scores |
| PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTS ACCURATELY TELL | | | | revealed that company’s culture was |
| YOU IF APPLICANT WILL FIT IN’ | | | | ultra-perfectionistic. In every job, the best |
| YOUR COMPANY’S CULTURE | | | | employees’ benchmark test scores |
| Pre-employment tests clearly tell you if a job | | | | included |
| applicant could fit in’ your | | | | * high test scores on Following Rules, |
| company’s culture. But, you must carry | | | | Fact-Focus, and Handling Small Details scales |
| out an important step. | | | | * low test scores on Flexibility and |
| Specifically, pre-employment tests first need to | | | | Emotion-Focus scales |
| be benchmarked for each job in your company. | | | | Clearly, this company’s culture relied on |
| For instance, let’s say you want to hire | | | | employees being obsessive-compulsive. |
| great sales reps. Start by having some of your | | | | When that company hired applicants who got |
| sales reps take the pre-employment test. Use | | | | pre-employment test scores similar to its best |
| this to find the benchmark or typical test | | | | employees, it hired winners — productive |
| scores of your best sales reps. Then, test | | | | employees who fit in’ the |
| applicants. Applicants who gets test scores | | | | company’s culture. But, when it hired |
| similar to your best sales reps have a good | | | | employees who got test scores different than its |
| likelihood ofa. being productive workersb. | | | | best employees, they failed on-the-job. |
| fitting in’ your company’s culture | | | | WARNING: 3 WAYS APPLICANTS TRICK YOU |
| EXAMPLES of PRE-EMPLOYMENT TEST | | | | IN JOB INTERVIEWS |
| BENCHMARKS REVEALING ORGANIZATIONAL | | | | The problem with interviewing job applicants is |
| CULTURE | | | | this: Most interviewers make mistaken |
| The pre-employment tests I created are used by | | | | judgments about applicants they interview. |
| many companies. So, in my consulting work, I | | | | Research backs up this assertion. Here are |
| conduct huge numbers of benchmarking studies | | | | conniving ways applicants trick interviewers: |
| to help companies hire the best. The benchmark | | | | 1. Trained how to job-hunt — so applicant |
| research uses two pre-employment tests: | | | | knows good answers to your interview questions |
| 1. Behavior Test — to forecast 5 | | | | 2. Study your company — so they act |
| personality traits, 3 interpersonal styles, and 5 | | | | like they have what you want |
| motivators | | | | 3. Charm — so interviewer gets |
| 2. Cognitive Ability Test — to forecast 5 | | | | carried away’ with appealing applicant |
| mental abilities or brainpower | | | | OOPS: 8 WAYS MANAGERS HIRE THE WRONG |
| Here are examples of pre-employment test | | | | PERSON |
| benchmarks revealing companies’ cultures. | | | | Plus, interviewers and hiring managers make |
| 1st Example = Friendly, Service-Focused | | | | many dumb mistakes — resulting in |
| Company Culture | | | | mistakenly thinking a lousy applicant is a good |
| One company using pre-employment tests from | | | | applicant. Here are five ways interviewers make |
| me benchmarked many of its jobs. In every | | | | dumb mistakes: |
| job, the company’s best employees got | | | | 1. Gives away good’ answers |
| these test scores: | | | | — tells applicant what interviewer is looking |
| * high scores on test’s Friendliness, | | | | for |
| Teamwork, Optimism, and Helping People scales | | | | 2. Blabbermouth — talks too much |
| * low scores on test’s Aggressiveness, | | | | — tells applicant what interviewer wants to |
| Rigidity, and Power Motivation scales | | | | hear |
| The pre-employment test benchmarks clearly | | | | 3. Desperate — interviewer wants to hire |
| reveal that company’s corporate culture. | | | | someone NOW |
| The test helps that company consistently hire | | | | 4. Lazy — hiring manager too lazy to find |
| productive employees who fit in’ its | | | | more and better applicants |
| friendly service culture. | | | | 5. Bullheaded — wants to hire whom s |
| 2nd Example = Knowledge-Driven Company | | | | he wants to hire’ — despite warning |
| Culture | | | | signs |
| Another company sells cutting-edge technology. | | | | Interviewers also make three dumb mistakes |
| Its growth potential is huge — but only if it | | | | when it comes to pre-employment testing: |
| hires the right sales reps. | | | | 6. Wrong Norms — uses national norms |
| In the pre-employment test benchmarking study, | | | | — rather than company customized |
| I found the company’s finest sales reps | | | | benchmarks |
| consistently got | | | | 7. Fails to Test Applicant — thus does not |
| * high scores on test’s Learning | | | | have most accurate, revealing evaluation |
| Motivation and Problem-Solving Ability scales | | | | 8. Ignores Test — bets against |
| * low scores on test’s Money Motivation | | | | company’s custom-tailored benchmark |
| and Creativity Motivation scales | | | | scores |
| The pre-employment test’s benchmark | | | | PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTS MAKE IT EASY TO |
| scores stunned the company’s VP-Sales. | | | | HIRE EMPLOYEES WHO FIT IN’ YOUR |
| He mistakenly thought his best sales reps were | | | | COMPANY’S CULTURE |
| creative and pay motivated. But, actually, the | | | | Fact: Each time you hire someone you are |
| best ones excelled at (a) learning about the | | | | betting. You bet your career and your |
| technology plus (b) intelligently problem-solving | | | | company’s financial success. |
| ways the technology would help prospective client | | | | Pre-employment tests using customized |
| operate more profitably. | | | | benchmarks for your company’s jobs |
| Wow. The pre-employment test benchmark | | | | make your bets easier, cheaper, faster, and more |
| scores were an eye-opener — and much | | | | likely to succeed. Tests objectively tell you if an |
| different than test scores of commission-driven | | | | applicant (a) fits in’ your organizational |
| salespeople. | | | | culture and (b) has work-related qualities similar to |
| These pre-employment tests enabled that | | | | your good employees. Job interviews seldom tell |
| company to peer into applicants’ minds | | | | you these important, profit-impacting insights. |
| — to reveal which applicants would fit | | | | You get such profit-improving insights from |
| in’ its knowledge-driven culture. | | | | correctly researched, benchmarked |
| 3rd Example = Perfectionistic, | | | | pre-employment tests. |